[nodel-discuss] [Fwd: NODE.London web development sessions]

[kwatson]

I have published the figures, from the ACE APP, In a shortened  
version, under the proposal sub heading. I would prefer it if it had  
it's own sub heading, but I can't work out how you add headings,  
(where is the page?).

If someone could spend some time doing this and tidying up the  
formatting, I'd appreciate it.

It was always part of the application that Atty would get a fee for  
spending time helping to transfer the content.
It was also agreed that as much of the content would be transfered as  
possible within budget, certainly all the links to venues, and artists  
and locations do need to be on the new site.

In answer to Adnan, asking about when the money would be released by  
ACE.

The success of the application is subject  to:

• confirmation that website will adhere to the PAS 78 guidelines of  
good practice in commissioning accessible websites

• A copy of your constitution including a memorandum of agreement and  
articles of association. This should be accompanied by a set of  
specific principles of engagement for volunteers agreed by the  
governing body for the organisation.

£4,500

• your completed activity report form.

£500

So we do need to agree the constitution and appoint an executive  
committee alongside the Web Development work. See Wiki.

regards
keith





On 27 Jan 2009, at 22:48, adnan hadzi wrote:

> i was wondering if we could publish the budget what exactly happens  
> with the £5000 on the wiki?
>
> laters,
> a.
>
> From: atty <atty at area3.net>
> Date: 27 January 2009 22:34:46 GMT
> To: a.hadzi at gold.ac.uk
> Cc: _manu Luksch <mL at ambienttv.net>, "Node. London" <nodel-discuss at one.server1.org 
> >, "ruth.catlow at furtherfield.org >> Ruth Catlow" <ruth.catlow at furtherfield.org 
> >
> Subject: NODE.London web development sessions
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am not really imagining taking much part in re-development of  
> Node.l site but I did happen to have a conversation with Rachel  
> Baker at a Furtherfield do where she asked me about the subject and  
> whether I would be involved
>
> I replied, hmmm, maybe, a bit, to which she responded she sincerely  
> hoped so and it would be a bit crazy if I wasn't
>
> so wondering why she thought this important, I asked her did she  
> expect all present site data to appear in new site to which she  
> replied most definitely. Apparently old/present site is used as a  
> kind of reference resource by the British Council I assume as a sort  
> of compendium of who is active in new media in London (and further a  
> field) and I can see this would therefore be of particular concern  
> to Rachel.
>
> so as I got a report that migrating the data was a bit undecided  
> from the first drafting meeting, I thought it worth mentioning it  
> does seem Rachel is keen that it happens. (it is possible though  
> that not all areas of data on the old site have equal value in her  
> eyes?)
>
> which would a mean a little bit of my time (a couple of hours only  
> maybe - this the small involvement that I imagined happening)  
> showing Lisa Haskel around the old data structure, quite a  
> substantial bit of her time (but eminently doable she thinks)  
> writing scripts etc to do the migration and so on.
>
> if images attached to data objects were to be retained there might  
> be some implications for design of new site as scaling down might be  
> fine but scaling up not so fine
>
> yours
> atty
>
>
>

Regards
Keith Watson
kwatson at romanesque.co.uk
+44 (0) 7802 74 84 84
skype: kw1330