[nodel-discuss] NODE.London web development sessions

[julie freeman]

Hi Keith,

I use this little gem for converting spreadsheets to wiki tables:

http://people.fas.harvard.edu/~sdouglas/table.cgi

Best wishes,
Julie


On 2 Feb 2009, at 00:19, kwatson wrote:

>
> I have published the figures, from the ACE APP, In a shortened
> version, under the proposal sub heading. I would prefer it if it had
> it's own sub heading, but I can't work out how you add headings,
> (where is the page?).
>
> If someone could spend some time doing this and tidying up the
> formatting, I'd appreciate it.
>
> It was always part of the application that Atty would get a fee for
> spending time helping to transfer the content.
> It was also agreed that as much of the content would be transfered as
> possible within budget, certainly all the links to venues, and artists
> and locations do need to be on the new site.
>
> In answer to Adnan, asking about when the money would be released by
> ACE.
>
> The success of the application is subject  to:
>
> • confirmation that website will adhere to the PAS 78 guidelines of
> good practice in commissioning accessible websites
>
> • A copy of your constitution including a memorandum of agreement and
> articles of association. This should be accompanied by a set of
> specific principles of engagement for volunteers agreed by the
> governing body for the organisation.
>
> £4,500
>
> • your completed activity report form.
>
> £500
>
> So we do need to agree the constitution and appoint an executive
> committee alongside the Web Development work. See Wiki.
>
> regards
> keith
>
>
>
>
>
> On 27 Jan 2009, at 22:48, adnan hadzi wrote:
>
>> i was wondering if we could publish the budget what exactly happens
>> with the £5000 on the wiki?
>>
>> laters,
>> a.
>>
>> From: atty <atty at area3.net>
>> Date: 27 January 2009 22:34:46 GMT
>> To: a.hadzi at gold.ac.uk
>> Cc: _manu Luksch <mL at ambienttv.net>, "Node. London" <nodel- 
>> discuss at one.server1.org
>>> , "ruth.catlow at furtherfield.org >> Ruth Catlow"  
>>> <ruth.catlow at furtherfield.org
>>>
>> Subject: NODE.London web development sessions
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am not really imagining taking much part in re-development of
>> Node.l site but I did happen to have a conversation with Rachel
>> Baker at a Furtherfield do where she asked me about the subject and
>> whether I would be involved
>>
>> I replied, hmmm, maybe, a bit, to which she responded she sincerely
>> hoped so and it would be a bit crazy if I wasn't
>>
>> so wondering why she thought this important, I asked her did she
>> expect all present site data to appear in new site to which she
>> replied most definitely. Apparently old/present site is used as a
>> kind of reference resource by the British Council I assume as a sort
>> of compendium of who is active in new media in London (and further a
>> field) and I can see this would therefore be of particular concern
>> to Rachel.
>>
>> so as I got a report that migrating the data was a bit undecided
>> from the first drafting meeting, I thought it worth mentioning it
>> does seem Rachel is keen that it happens. (it is possible though
>> that not all areas of data on the old site have equal value in her
>> eyes?)
>>
>> which would a mean a little bit of my time (a couple of hours only
>> maybe - this the small involvement that I imagined happening)
>> showing Lisa Haskel around the old data structure, quite a
>> substantial bit of her time (but eminently doable she thinks)
>> writing scripts etc to do the migration and so on.
>>
>> if images attached to data objects were to be retained there might
>> be some implications for design of new site as scaling down might be
>> fine but scaling up not so fine
>>
>> yours
>> atty
>>
>>
>>
>
> Regards
> Keith Watson
> kwatson at romanesque.co.uk
> +44 (0) 7802 74 84 84
> skype: kw1330
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nodel-discuss mailing list
> nodel-discuss at one.server1.org
> http://one.server1.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nodel-discuss