[nodeval] prioritised aims for node.l evaluation questions

[Saul Albert]

On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 01:38:14PM -0000, Corrado Morgana wrote:
> IMPORTANT
> 
> In the construction of any questionnaire do not rule out any unexpected
> outcomes!!
> 
> Don't close the questionnaire down too much-sure, I don't think it will be
> considering the qualitative focus but mentioned just in case
> 
> I've done a few action research projects before and the evaluation was
> mostly comprised of interpretations of unexpected outcomes
> 
> Something like Q:did anything unecpected come out of your experience with
> Node.L?
> 
> Just my 2p's worth
> 
> Corrado 

Cool - looks good. How about putting your 2p in the wiki Corrado! :)

I've been playing with Skype-rec - basically a way of recording skype
conversations. This seems like a very good way to do qualitative
interviews with VOs and other online people for the Internal assessment.

What do people think? Would anyone like to do a trial run with me -
answer the VO questions on skype, then do some Snowballesque stuff?

I'll read the pdfs that have been distributed, but I've got to say, I
don't have much more time to spend this week, so I'd appreciate some more
pro-active wiki editing of those questions. I think I spent my energies
on making wikis and mailing lists and don't have much left over for
really getting to grips with the questions...

Perhaps someone else with more of a grip on the process already would
like to have a go at doing my homework over the weekend. The wiki is open
for business and ready for your collaborative participation!

haha

Saul.

-- 
-- http://chinabone.lth.bclub.org.uk/~saul/